Where Did the Towers Go?: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy

Where Did the Towers Go?: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 This book is a forensic analysis of what effectively is a crime scene Ground Zero and the surrounding areas were photographed countless thousands of times, yet no one really assessed all of the phenomena found in these photographs What is presented in this book is not a theory and it is not speculation It is evidence It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened at Ground ZeroAnyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda The popular chant, was an inside job, is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant thatbad guys with box cutters did it Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committedThe order of crime solving is to determine WHAT happened, then HOW it happened eg what weapon , then WHO did it And only then can we address WHY they did it ie motiveLet us remember what is required to legally convict someone of a crime You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don t even know what crime to charge them with If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it Yet, before noon on , we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it they hate us for our freedoms before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been doneMany people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of and or how they did so But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing than conspiracy theory My research is not speculation It is a forensic investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on

About the Author: Judy D. Wood

Dr Judy D Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics SEM , co founded SEM s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.Dr Wood received her B.S Civil Engineering, 1981 Structural Engineering , M.S Engineering Mechanics Applied Physics , 1983 , and Ph.D Materials Engineering Science, 1992 from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints She has taught courses including Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials Strength of Materials Strength of Materials TestingIs this what Eisenhower warned us of Where did the building go Figure 1 My intellectual integrity prevents me from calling this a collapse This is why I have chosen to stand up My conscience leaves me no other choice.From 1999 to 2006 Dr Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech.One of Dr Wood s research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber reinforced composite materials and biological materials Dr Wood is an expert in the use of moir interferometry, a full field optical method that is used in stress analysis, as well as materials characterization and other types of interference In recent years, Dr Wood and her students have developed optical systems with various wavelengths and waveguides Dr Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports.Dr Wood started to question the events of 9 11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told.

10 thoughts on “Where Did the Towers Go?: Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

  1. says:

    You only have to read to page 24 to know beyond any doubt that you are reading a planet shifting publication You have enough evidence to convince a jury that the official accounting of 9 11 is impossible Dr Judy Wood has given us a key to unlocking our future Starting with the evidence she s gathered in

  2. says:

    My biggest surprise in reading this book is that after 11 years of my interest in this subject, that there could be one book with so much startling and at the same time completely credible new information I now believe it to be the MOST important book written about the events of that tragic day, and recommend it

  3. says:

    This is a book with far reaching implicationsand that is an understatement Painstakingly researched and documented with endless photographs many of which i had never seen and diagrams, this is a textbook education It s a 40 hardcover but luckily my library had it in the Business and Technology section Absolutely a World

  4. says:

    This book does not address any WHO or WHY questions.This book simply asks, WHAT happened on September 11, 2001 Dr Wood argues that neither the official story nor theories of so called 9 11 Truthers such as controlled demolition, thermite, etc can explain what we saw on that day.Before reading this book I, finding the official s

  5. says:

    Dr Judy Wood is the only person who has successfully filed suit against the U.S government on 9 11 which went to the Supreme Court, who decided not to take up the case As a scientific mind and well qualified doctor, she found and proved in the comprehensive well documented research presented here, that it would be against the laws of p

  6. says:

    Most people, even people that read good books, refuse to consider anything but the official story that fire and aluminum planes brought down two of the strongest buildings in the world They won t even consider the event from a purely scientific aspect it s just too much for them Let them take comfort in their cozy notion that the bad guys are

  7. says:

    Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic.

  8. says:

    This book is beyond bizarre and beyond interesting.I must say that half of what the author says I don t agree with.There were fires in both of the towers there were eyewitnesses that saw them Although the extent of the fires is unknown.There were missiles or airplanes or something that hit the tower there were about 1000 witnesses on the ground that saw this

  9. says:

    I held off on getting into the 911 Conspiracy mire until this book It is like a text book, has lots of graphs and pictures of Ground Zero It makes a very scientific case that fire was NOT the cause of the collapse of three buildings and partial destruction of several adjacent buildings but that some other mechanism was at work.Bottom line it makes the case that the b

  10. says:

    Fantastic reading Lots of insight This is a book that takes you to a deeper understanding of the truths behind that shattering day that has marked history forever Very different spin and theories that help you dig for yourself Very thought provoking Took month to get thru, but was worth the read.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top